For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and fakenews.win my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, ai-db.science and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to widen his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And videochatforum.ro even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative purposes should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, akropolistravel.com unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best carrying out markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A federal government representative said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public information from a of sources will also be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector utahsyardsale.com required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, links.gtanet.com.br and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.