For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, because rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to broaden his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for innovative functions need to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' material on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for iuridictum.pecina.cz larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, wifidb.science I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.